Search

Commercial & Business Litigation

Banning Harmful Food Additives at the Intersection of Law, Health, and Policy

May 8, 2024

Illinois Senate Bill 2637 to ban four harmful food additives by 2028; civil penalties outlined for violations.

Key Takeaways

  • Illinois Senate Bill 2637 proposes banning four harmful food additives by 2028, with phased implementation to allow retailers and distributors to adapt.
  • Violations of the ban could result in civil penalties ranging from $5,000 for a first offense up to $10,000 for subsequent offenses.
  • The bill has received bipartisan support, emphasizing the health risks of additives like red dye number 3, which is linked to cancer and still widely used in foods.

Senate Bill 2637  

A bill that takes aim at four common food additives passed through the Illinois State Senate on April 18th, on its way to the House and potentially the Governor’s desk. As introduced, the bill would amend the  Illinois Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by stipulating that the manufacture, sale, delivery, distribution, holding, or offering for sale of a food product for human consumption that contains food additives will be banned starting on January 1, 2027. The food additives in question are brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben, and red dye 3.  

It has been recently amended to reflect that the manufacture of a food product containing these additives will violate the Act starting in 2027. The sale, distribution, holding, or offering of a food product for human consumption that contains those substances would only be banned starting on January 1, 2028, ostensibly to provide time for distributors and retailers to catch up.  

A person or entity that violates that prohibition will face civil liabilities in the form of up to $5,000 for the first offense and up to $10,000 for each successive offense after that.  

Dangers of Additives  

The additives that this legislation would ban have been found to be detrimental to health and linked to a variety of health issues, from allergies to chronic illnesses. The Center for Science in the Public Interest has conducted studies into the effects of these additives and found that they also can cause cancer in humans and animals. Therefore, they are considered carcinogenic.  

Red dye number 3 is a color additive that is illegal to use in cosmetics. It is externally applied but is still widely used in food products, which are obviously internally ingested. It can be found in candies like candy corn, Ners, Peeps, Pez, Sweet Tarts, and hundreds of others, as well as in cakes and other foods like Morning Star Farms bacon strips. Scientists have been urging the Food and Drug Administration to ban red dye number 3 for years now.  

Bipartisan Support  

Though the bill was sponsored by Democrats, the vote in favor in the Senate was bipartisan. Democratic Senator Willie Preston introduced the bill, but Republicans who support it include Senators Seth Lewis and Steve McClure. Senator Lewis stated that “it is time we take a serious look at what is in the snacks, drinks and other foods we are putting in our bodies and into the bodies of our children,” and noted that several countries have already enacted their own bans on the chemicals listed in this legislation.    

Opposition  

Despite the amendment allowing retailers and distributors more time to make necessary changes, various trade groups like the National Confectioners Association and the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association are unsurprisingly opposed. Both groups say that a ban on these additives should be left to the U.S. Department of Food and Administration and not the State Legislature. However, other states have considered such bans, like Indiana, West Virginia, and Maryland; New York and Pennsylvania are currently considering their own prohibitions; and California notably passed the nation’s first ban on food additives in 2023.    

Food Policy  

A lot of food policy in the United States tends to focus on either the production, from an agricultural standpoint, such as subsidies to farmers or regulation of genetically modified food products; retail-related matters, such as food product labeling regulations and inspections; or on food assistance to lower-income individuals in the form of food stamps and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infant, and Children. These are all significant avenues to address the issues the public faces and the state of Illinois has its own versions of many of these policies.  

Ingredients in food products get a fair amount of attention, too, with people becoming more informed about what food labels actually mean and what goes into their favorite products. With this increased awareness and interest from the public, it is fitting that our state representatives take these issues into consideration to forge new paths for a healthier future for our communities.  

Food deserts are areas lacking convenient access to grocery stores and sources of fresh fruits and vegetables. Most of the people living in food deserts tend to be on the lower end of the economic scale, and these households have no choice but to rely on products from convenience stores. Convenience stores tend to carry the most highly processed foods, and processed foods are the main culprits carrying the additives in question. Low-income families are at a disproportionate disadvantage when it comes to exposure to these harmful ingredients. By passing this legislation, Illinois can ensure that all of its residents are protected from the dangers of these additives regardless of where they live within the state.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this blog is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Each individual's legal needs are unique, and these materials may not be applicable to your legal situation. Always seek the advice of a competent attorney with any questions you may have regarding a legal issue. Do not disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this blog.
 in 
Text Link
 category

Contributors

Written by
Anna W
Factchecked by
Kevin O'Flaherty
Sign up to our newsletter
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Related Legal Topics

No items found.
Local Law

Banning Harmful Food Additives at the Intersection of Law, Health, and Policy

Anna W
May 8, 2024

Key Takeaways

  • Illinois Senate Bill 2637 proposes banning four harmful food additives by 2028, with phased implementation to allow retailers and distributors to adapt.
  • Violations of the ban could result in civil penalties ranging from $5,000 for a first offense up to $10,000 for subsequent offenses.
  • The bill has received bipartisan support, emphasizing the health risks of additives like red dye number 3, which is linked to cancer and still widely used in foods.

Senate Bill 2637  

A bill that takes aim at four common food additives passed through the Illinois State Senate on April 18th, on its way to the House and potentially the Governor’s desk. As introduced, the bill would amend the  Illinois Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by stipulating that the manufacture, sale, delivery, distribution, holding, or offering for sale of a food product for human consumption that contains food additives will be banned starting on January 1, 2027. The food additives in question are brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, propylparaben, and red dye 3.  

It has been recently amended to reflect that the manufacture of a food product containing these additives will violate the Act starting in 2027. The sale, distribution, holding, or offering of a food product for human consumption that contains those substances would only be banned starting on January 1, 2028, ostensibly to provide time for distributors and retailers to catch up.  

A person or entity that violates that prohibition will face civil liabilities in the form of up to $5,000 for the first offense and up to $10,000 for each successive offense after that.  

Dangers of Additives  

The additives that this legislation would ban have been found to be detrimental to health and linked to a variety of health issues, from allergies to chronic illnesses. The Center for Science in the Public Interest has conducted studies into the effects of these additives and found that they also can cause cancer in humans and animals. Therefore, they are considered carcinogenic.  

Red dye number 3 is a color additive that is illegal to use in cosmetics. It is externally applied but is still widely used in food products, which are obviously internally ingested. It can be found in candies like candy corn, Ners, Peeps, Pez, Sweet Tarts, and hundreds of others, as well as in cakes and other foods like Morning Star Farms bacon strips. Scientists have been urging the Food and Drug Administration to ban red dye number 3 for years now.  

Bipartisan Support  

Though the bill was sponsored by Democrats, the vote in favor in the Senate was bipartisan. Democratic Senator Willie Preston introduced the bill, but Republicans who support it include Senators Seth Lewis and Steve McClure. Senator Lewis stated that “it is time we take a serious look at what is in the snacks, drinks and other foods we are putting in our bodies and into the bodies of our children,” and noted that several countries have already enacted their own bans on the chemicals listed in this legislation.    

Opposition  

Despite the amendment allowing retailers and distributors more time to make necessary changes, various trade groups like the National Confectioners Association and the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association are unsurprisingly opposed. Both groups say that a ban on these additives should be left to the U.S. Department of Food and Administration and not the State Legislature. However, other states have considered such bans, like Indiana, West Virginia, and Maryland; New York and Pennsylvania are currently considering their own prohibitions; and California notably passed the nation’s first ban on food additives in 2023.    

Food Policy  

A lot of food policy in the United States tends to focus on either the production, from an agricultural standpoint, such as subsidies to farmers or regulation of genetically modified food products; retail-related matters, such as food product labeling regulations and inspections; or on food assistance to lower-income individuals in the form of food stamps and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infant, and Children. These are all significant avenues to address the issues the public faces and the state of Illinois has its own versions of many of these policies.  

Ingredients in food products get a fair amount of attention, too, with people becoming more informed about what food labels actually mean and what goes into their favorite products. With this increased awareness and interest from the public, it is fitting that our state representatives take these issues into consideration to forge new paths for a healthier future for our communities.  

Food deserts are areas lacking convenient access to grocery stores and sources of fresh fruits and vegetables. Most of the people living in food deserts tend to be on the lower end of the economic scale, and these households have no choice but to rely on products from convenience stores. Convenience stores tend to carry the most highly processed foods, and processed foods are the main culprits carrying the additives in question. Low-income families are at a disproportionate disadvantage when it comes to exposure to these harmful ingredients. By passing this legislation, Illinois can ensure that all of its residents are protected from the dangers of these additives regardless of where they live within the state.

Article by
Anna W
Factchecked by
Kevin O'Flaherty
Schedule a Consultation
Expertise Best Child Support Lawyers in Chicago 201710 Best 2016 Client Satisfaction American Institute of Family Law AttorneysAvvo Clients' Choice 2016 DivorceRising Stars Kevin P. O'Flaherty SuperLawyers.com10 Best Law Firms 2018 Client Satisfaction American Institute of Family Legal Counsel Attorneys Estate Planning Law40 under forty

Contact Us

Please contact our friendly lawyers to Schedule a Consultation.

See below for our other locations. If our office locations are not convenient for you, we are happy to speak with you by phone.

We're here to help!
Email
Info@Oflaherty-Law.com
Phone
(630) 324-6666

What to Expect From a Consultation

The purpose of a  consultation is to determine whether our firm is a good fit for your legal needs. Although we often discuss expected results and costs, our attorneys do not give legal advice unless and until you choose to retain us. Consultations may carry a charge, depending on the facts of the matter and the area of law. The cost of your consultation, if any, is communicated to you by our intake team or the attorney.

Hours of Operation

Monday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Tuesday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Wednesday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Thursday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Friday
9:00am - 6:00pm
Saturday
Closed
Sunday
Closed

Our Service Areas

Illinois

O'Flaherty Law Of Arlington Heights
Learn About Our Remote Law Approach

Meet the Owner

I am personally committed to ensuring that each one of our clients receives the highest level of client service from our team.  Our mission is to provide excellent legal work in a cost-effective manner while maintaining open lines of communication between our clients and their attorneys.  Many of our clients are going through difficult times in their lives when they reach out to us.  They should feel comfortable leaning on the experience and knowledge of our attorneys as their counselors and advocates.  We are here to help!

- Attorney Kevin O'Flaherty, Owner